|
|
Fellow of ACRM (FACRM)
2008
Deadline: April 3, 2008
The
American Congress of Rehabilitation (ACRM) is the world's leading interdisciplinary
rehabilitation research organization. The Fellow of ACRM designation
recognizes individuals who have made significant contributions to the
field of medical rehabilitation and to the ACRM.
The
ACRM Fellow subcommittee is accepting nominations for the Fellow of
ACRM designation, to be announced at the 2007 annual meeting of the
Congress. Members in good standing may nominate their colleagues or
themselves. Completed nomination packets are due by April 3, 2008. Nomination
forms and Award Criteria are available below or by contacting Judy
Reuter at the ACRM National Office.
Nomination
Procedures:
1. Nominations may be made by members in good standing or by self-nomination
by a member in good standing.
2.
Nominations for the award must be received in the national office
no later than April 3 for formal recognition of the elected Fellows
at the following national conference. The following are needed for
an application to be complete: current curriculum vitae of the nominee,
a narrative statement by the nominator, 3 letters of support written
by persons other than the nominator, an application form with pertinent
nominee and nominator information and a nominee biosketch (maximum
300 words). Nominators are also invited to submit copies of published
papers of the nominee or other documents that demonstrate the basis
for the nomination. A description of each component of the application
package follows:
-
A full curriculum vitae or resume is required; a biographical
sketch alone is NOT sufficient.
-
The narrative statement by the nominator should specify WHY the
facts summarized in the resume constitute outstanding performance
worthy of selection as FACRM. A simple restating of the information
in the CV is not sufficient. Candidates may be nominated based
on their clinical, research, educational or administrative accomplishments.
Regardless of the area of expertise, the narrative statement should
spell out how the candidate's work has impacted the field
of rehabilitation and ACRM. Some examples follow:
-
Clinician-
Rather than listing the positions held by the nominee, specify
what assessment methods, interventions, devices, etc. have
been developed by the nominee and the extent to which such
products have been adopted within the field.
-
Researcher-
Rather than noting the number of papers published by the nominee,
explain how the nominee's publications have influenced the
practice of rehabilitation.
-
Educator-
Rather than reporting the number of years the nominee has
been engaged in teaching, indicate what curriculum or program
changes have occurred as the result of the nominee's contributions.
-
Administrator-
Rather than reviewing the nominee's administrative responsibilities,
describe how the nominee established an inter-institutional
collaboration that broadened educational opportunities and
decreased faculty resource requirements.
-
At
least one letter of support should come from an ACRM member. Each
letter of support should clearly indicate the institution with
which the nominator is affiliated, and in what capacity the writer
has known the nominee. Letters must reflect genuine knowledge
and consideration of the nominee's credentials. Like the nominator,
the letter writers should not simply restate the facts presented
in the resume, but indicate why and how these facts have had a
major impact on medical rehabilitation as a whole, and on ACRM
specifically.
- The
biosketch should be submitted electronically and is limited to
300 words. The biosketch should provide a factual summary of the
candidate's career. It is distinct from the narrative statement
in that the biosketch provides a general overview of the candidate's
background while the narrative statement explains how the candidate's
work has influenced the field of rehabilitation and the ACRM.
3. Individuals who are nominated and not selected may be nominated
again at a later date.
4.
Standing members of the Fellows Committee may not serve as a nominator
nor are they permitted to submit a letter of support for a nominee.
Note: Nominators are urged to submit all application materials
to the national office electronically. The biosketch must be submitted
electronically.
Review
Process and Timeline:
-
After
the ACRM national office has received nominations for a particular
year, it is the responsibility of the Fellows Committee to process
nominations that have been received, and to assess nominees' eligibility.
The national office will provide a complete copy of each nominee's
application package to all members of the Fellows Committee along
with a "Committee Evaluation Form" which includes the
candidate's name and room for the recommendation of the Committee
member.
-
Nominees
will be discussed by teleconference so that selections can be
completed by May 15th of each year. Final dispositions will be
documented on the Committee Evaluation Form. A two-thirds vote
of the voting-members of the Fellows Committee is necessary for
the nomination to be brought forward to the Board. Final recommendations
will be made available to the Board no later than June 1st.
-
The
name of each candidate recommended is forwarded to the Board along
with the Committee Evaluation Form and the other supporting documents.
The recommendation package will be accompanied by a cover letter
from the Committee Chair indicating that the supporting documents
are for reference in the event that a Board member has serious
concern about a particular candidate.
-
The
Board will vote by simple majority to approve or disapprove the
recommendations of the Fellows Committee during the next scheduled
Board teleconference (i.e., June or July). Board action will be
documented on the Committee Evaluation Form.
-
If
a recommended nominee is rejected by the Board, written documentation
outlining the basis for challenging the nomination will be recorded
on the Evaluation Form and returned to the Committee chair through
the Board liaison within 7 days of the decision.
-
The
Fellows Committee reviews the Board's dissenting opinion and the
Committee chair prepares a written response which is forwarded
back to the Board by the liaison within 7 days of receiving the
dissenting opinion.
-
The
Board reviews the Committee's response within one week of receipt
and a final vote is taken by e-mail or other means to approve
or disapprove the nomination.
Award
Presentation:
-
After
the Board approves a nomination, the Fellows Committee Chair apprises
new Fellows of their acceptance and invites them to attend the
annual meeting. The Chair also responds to the nominators, apprising
them of the Board's decision and contacts nominators of candidates
that were not accepted, apprising them of the Committee's/Board's
decision.
-
New
Fellows will be recognized by the ACRM President at the annual
meeting and will receive a framed certificate designating the
member to the Roster of Fellows (to be maintained at the national
office).Additional acknowledgement may include:
-
Announcement
of new Fellows at the annual meeting by the President of the ACRM
Board of Governors during the President's Reception and/or the
business meeting. An abridged version of the nominee's biosketch
may be used for this purpose.
-
Publishing
the names of new Fellows in the ACRM Annual Program, Rehabilitation
Outlook, Archives of PM&R and/or on the ACRM website.
-
Printing
photos of new Fellows in the Final Annual Meeting Program, Rehabilitation
Outlook, Archives of PM&R and the ACRM website.
-
Mailing
a letter of recognition to the new Fellow's place of employment.
- Sending
a press release to local media.
A
person receiving this award may identify him/herself by using "F.A.C.R.M."
after his/her signature. These initials shall be included in the identifying
information that follows their name in the registry as evidence of
this honor.
FACRM
Nomination Form
Criteria
& Selection Procedures
FACRM
Recipients, listed by year.
|
2007
FACRM Recipients |
Wayne
Gordon, PhD, ABPP/Cn, FACRM
Daniel Graves, PhD, FACRM |
|
|
2006
FACRM Recipients |
Joel
DeLisa, MD, MS, FACRM
Tessa Hart, PhD, FACRM |
Ralph
Marino, MD, FACRM
Mark Sherer, PhD, FACRM |
|
2005
FACRM Recipients |
Marcel
Dijkers, PhD, FACRM
Allen Heinemann, PhD, FACRM
Jeffrey Kreutzer, PhD, FACRM |
Kenneth
Ottenbacher, PhD, OT, FACRM
Deborah Wilkerson, MA, FACRM |
|
2004
FACRM Recipients |
Joseph
Giacino, PhD, FACRM
Douglas
Harrington, PhD, FACRM |
Mark
Johnston, PhD, FACRM
Jerome Tobis, BS, MD, FACRM |
|
2003
FACRM Recipients |
|
Herman
Flax, MD, FACRM
Dorothea
D. Glass, MD, FACRM
Dorothy
L. Gordon, DNSc, RN, FACRM
Martin
Grabois, MD, FACRM |
Diana
H. Rintala, PhD, FACRM
Thomas
E. Strax, MD, BA, FACRM
Denise
G. Tate, PhD, FACRM
|
|
2002
FACRM Recipients |
Henry
B. Betts, MD, FACRM
Bruce M. Caplan, PhD, ABPP, FACRM
Diana D. Cardenas, MD, FACRM
Larry E. Cervelli, BS, OTR, FACRM
Keith D. Cicerone, PhD, ABPP, FACRM
Theodore M. Cole, MD, FACRM
John D. Corrigan, PhD, FACRM
Gerben DeJong, PhD, FACRM
Susan A. Garber, MA, OTR, FAOTA, FACRM
J. Preston Harley, PhD, FACRM
Karen A. Hart, PhD, FACRM |
Douglas
I. Katz, MD, FACRM
James F. Malec, PhD, FACRM
John L. Melvin, MD, MMSc, FACRM
Philip A. Morse, PhD, FACRM
Gladys P. Rodriguez, PhD, FACRM
Mitchell Rosenthal, PhD, ABPP, FACRM
Marcia J. Scherer, PhD, FACRM
Margaret G. Stineman, MD, FACRM
Gale G. Whiteneck, PhD, FACRM
John Whyte, MD, PhD, FACRM
Karen Wunch, MS, RN, FACRM |
|





|